What does the term 'Justify-Past-Actions' mean in decision making?

The term 'Justify-Past-Actions' in decision-making refers to the tendency of individuals to rationalize or defend decisions they have previously made, particularly when those decisions may not have led to the desired outcomes. When faced with consequences from past actions, individuals might find themselves grappling with the need to explain or validate their choices instead of re-evaluating them based on new information or context. This behavior often stems from a psychological need to maintain self-consistency and avoid feelings of regret or cognitive dissonance.

In contrast, other options describe different approaches to decision-making. Making decisions based on complete information relates more to a rational decision-making process where all available data is considered. Relying on gut feelings pertains to intuition-based decision-making, which can sometimes lead to effective outcomes but lacks the rigor of analytical processes. Choosing the most convenient option emphasizes decision-making based on ease rather than thorough analysis, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Thus, the concept of 'Justify-Past-Actions' specifically highlights the struggle to change or reconsider previously made decisions instead of integrating new perspectives.