Which of the following is NOT a response to a Miranda Warning?

The selection of the option indicating that embedding new evidence against oneself is not a response to a Miranda Warning is indeed accurate. When individuals are given their Miranda rights, they are informed of their rights to remain silent and to have legal counsel present during questioning. Responses that typically follow include either asserting these rights or waiving them to speak with law enforcement.

Embedding new evidence against oneself does not fit alongside the established responses because it involves the individual inadvertently or explicitly providing self-incriminating information during interrogation. This action is not a conscious response to the Miranda Warning, as it does not reflect an exercise of the rights granted by the warning. Instead, it constitutes a scenario where a suspect may say something that reveals guilt, which is neither a formal nor advised reaction to a legal rights advisory.

In contrast, asserting the right to silence or to an attorney is a direct and recognizeable response to the warnings. Waiving rights and continuing to answer questions is also a clear choice individuals can make when they wish to cooperate with law enforcement despite being informed of their rights. Therefore, the option regarding embedding new evidence does not accurately represent a proper response to receiving a Miranda Warning, making it the correct choice.